Games such as Second Life may provide a great opportunity for opening social doors for people with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). This virtual world allows users to create characters and interact socially with others in an online world. In a recent article, CNN reports on how this can be beneficial. Created by an adult with Asperger’s Syndrome, Naughty Auties is a world where people with ASD can interact with one another in a more relaxed, less socially intimidating environment. This sounds like a great solution for teaching social interaction and working on social skills.
This kind of solution for helping teens and adults with ASD may end up causing more harm than good. In worlds such as Second Life, there are an unfortunate group of people called “griefers” whose sole purpose is to cause harm to others. These people literally seek out vulnerable people in these online worlds and deliberately disrupt the world and cause harm, just because they can. In worlds such as Second Life, there is no supervision, there are no limits, and anyone can get in and do whatever they want and say whatever they want. This opens the doors for griefers and others will the wrong intentions. For the ASD community, they are especially vulnerable due to their difficulties with understanding subtle social cues and often, language difficulties.
Although I support the idea of providing a virtual world for working on social skills and understanding, I am nervous about an open-ended world where people with disabilities are completely exposed and open to griefers. Instead, I would like to see something similar that is not open to anyone wanting to join, and that operates in a more controlled space perhaps with computer players (like in the SIMS) or with invite-only people that have been screened. The other issue to consider is how effective this kind of environment is for increasing skills, with no data collection or research on the effectiveness of doing this for someone with ASD, I would hesitate. Research is clearly needed on this kind of program, particularly if it is described as an intervention or skill-building program.
In general, I think the idea is great, but people should be aware of the potential risks before jumping into a world with so many risks.
Subscribe to content updates
April 8th, 2008 at 4:37 am
I’ve played Sims and I believe it has some educational value as far as relationship education, but of course there’s no research on that.
The power of second life is in the social networking that takes place within different communities. It’s the open nature of it that makes it so powerful and appealing, as there are millions of other people to interact with. Yeah, there are griefers which can spoil the party but that occurs in real life, too. At least in the virtual world they can work together on dealing with miscreants and try out different methods in different virtual settings. Making it more restrictive would make it safer but would limit the social opportunities, which I think makes the price too steep.
I agree, branding it as an intervention for autism is going a bit far. It can be a game and an educational tool for learning new skills, but it is mostly 3D social networking.
D.
September 19th, 2008 at 5:22 pm
I also agree that branding Sims as an intervention for autism is not suitable. Sims has very little, if any, educational value. It’s very easy to become addicted to these tiypes of games and those with autism are especially prone to being addicted, so definitely shouldn’t play it. Although there haven’t been formal empirical studies involving those with autism playing these role playing games, several experts in the field have voiced their opinions against it. As those who have parented or worked with people on the autism spectrum know, computer games like sims not only don’t teach social interaction, but are considered harmful in the long run to effectively getting along with people. Role playing games like Sims show an unrealistic idea of what life is like and don’t teach any social situations (at least not appropriately).
I’ve taught middle and high school students with autism for over 15 years. Their maturity level and developmental age is usually 2/3 of their chronological age. This means an 18 year old would be like emotionally like a 12 yr. old. The Sims games (with people) are rated ‘teen.’ Ask any parent of a teen with autism and you’ll find out why a game like this would be detrimental to their development.
There are so many software programs out there that do teach socially skills appropriately (Social Skills Builder for one has dozens), so why not try one of those instead?
February 18th, 2009 at 10:37 am
I think games like second life may give people with ASD a more effective way to communicate. It could also increase social activities for those who are prone to be isolated and shy. I think all computer games can be beneficial particularly to children with special needs. These games can be tailored for a specific skill set and easily track data for the child playing them. A great example of this is http://avenscorner.com.
April 8th, 2009 at 4:57 am
As a Newbie, I am always searching online for articles that can help me. Thank you
June 5th, 2009 at 4:43 am
It would be great if one could turn back the clock. - nice piece!
June 10th, 2009 at 1:18 pm
Hi, I can’t understand how to add your site in my rss reader. Can you help me, please